Native and Non-native Speeches in the 4th ELTIC Conference: Genre Analysis

Sudar Sudar

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the production of speeches by native and non-native Keynote Speakers in the 4th ELTIC Conference. The speeches spoken by native and non-native speakers are investigated from a genre analysis. Particularly, it is from a rhetoric and linguistics perspective. The writer uses descriptive qualitative research. It is stated that speeches spoken by native and non-native have different rhetoric and linguistics styles when they were delivering their speeches in the conference. The native speaker delivering the speech is fully expressive and used linguistics styles based on the context. While the non-native delivers the speech formally and refers to references that were used. It meant that a native speaker uses rhetoric and linguistics styles naturally, while non-native speaker in delivering the speeches is still interfered by the first language styles.

Keywords


Key words: analysis, ETIC-conference, genre, linguistic, native and non-native keynote-speaker, Speeches, rhetoric.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatia, V.K. (1997). Genre Analysis Today. In Revue beige de Philologie et d’historie, tome 75, fast, 3. Languages at literatures modern. Retrieved from https://www.persee.tr/doc/rpbh_0035-0818_1997_num75_3_4188.

Chandler, Dl. (1997). an Introduction to Genre Theory. http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/intgenre/intgenre.html.

Collin, R. (2012). Discourse in Genre: A new Approach to the Study of Literature Practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(1), 76–96. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/journalPermission.nav.DOI:10.1177/1086296X11431627 http://jlr.sagepub.com.

Davit, M. J. (2009). Genre Performances: John Swale’s Genre Analysis and Rhetorical –Linguistic Genre Studies. University of Kansas.

Hanafi, S. & Signh, S. (2012). Revisiting Genre Analysis: Applying Vijay K. Bhatia’s Approach. The 8th International Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) Seminar- Aligning Theoretical Knowledge with Professional Practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 66-370-379. www.sciencedirec.com.

Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and Language Education. In Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. London Office. Edinburg Gate. London: Harlow CM20 2JE. Retrieved from www.pearsoneduc.com/Linguistics

Marshall, C.. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publication, Inc. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, California 91320. E-mail: [email protected].

Miles, B. M., Huberman A. M. & Saldana, J.. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publication, Inc.2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, California 91320.

Nagao, A. (2019). The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0069-3

Shamsudin, H. & Signh, S. (2012). Revisiting Genre Analysis: Applying Vijay Bhatia’s Approach. In The 8th International Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) Seminar- Aligning Theoretical Knowledge With Professional Practice. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 66- (pp. 370–379). Retrieved from www.sciencedirec.com.

Swales, J. (1997). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press. The Edinburg Building, Cambridge, CB2 2 RU, United Kingdom.

Tiainen, K. (2012). A Genre Analysis of Academic Research Blogs. University of Helsinki.

Utomo, S.. (2010). The Rhetorical Structure of Barack Obama’s And Hillary Clinton’s Debates during Democratic Campaign Period of American Presidential Election in 2008. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements For the Doctorate Degree in Language Education. Post Graduate Program, State University of Semarang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v20i1.2654



Copyright (c) 2020 Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature



| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | web
analytics View My Stats