.jpg)
Capability Versus Imparsiality of Doctors as Medical Disputes Mediators
Abstract
Abstract: In medical dispute resolution through mediation, a mediator with the medical qualification will be easier to facilitate the mediation process because of their expertise related to substance, but health workers which have high solidity towards the profession which will make it difficult for them to be impartial.
The principal aim of this thesis was to study the doctor’s capability and doctor’s impartiality as a mediator in medical disputes. The issue will be discussed normatively juridically through the statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach with Malaysia, Australia, and Netherland as the comparative country.
From this research, it can be concluded that the capability of doctors as mediators of medical disputes lies in the gravity levels of doctors who are commensurate with the context of the dispute. Malaysia, Australia, and the Netherlands have required that mediators need to have an understanding of the substance and have technical knowledge of the problem at hand. A doctor’s impartiality as a mediator in medical disputes will have a tendency of partisanship and conflicts of interest.
Keywords: Capability, Impartiality, Doctor, Mediator, Medical DisputeKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Daftar Peraturan Perundang Undangan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999, tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 138. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3872
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009, tentang Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 144. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5063.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 tahun 2009, tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076
Buku-Buku
Abbas, S. Mediasi dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2011.
Agazzi, Evandro. Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017.
Abdulkadir, Muhammad. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cet. 1, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.
Barret, Jerrome T. A History of Alternative Dispute Resolution, Wiley, San Fransisco, 2014.
Esplugues, Carlos dan Marquis, Louis. New Developments in Civil and Comercial Mediation, Springer, Switzerland, 2015.
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Edition, Thomson Reuters, Minessota, 2014.
Hadikumsuma, Hilman. Metode Pembuatan Kertas Kerja Atau Skripsi Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1995.
Komalawati, V. Hukum dan Etika Dalam Praktek Dokter, Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2016.
Majelis Kehormatan Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (MKEK), Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia, Pengurus Besar Ikatan Dokter Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012.
Malaysia, Attorney General Chambers. Act 749, Mediation Act 2012, Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhard, Kuala Lumpur, 2012.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2005.
Nederlands, Mediatorsfederatie. MfN-Mediationreglement. Amsterdam, 2019
Rahmadi, T. Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2017.
Riyadi, Machli. Teori IKNEMOOK dalam Mediasi Malpraktik Medik, Kencana, Jakarta, 2018.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2006.
Stevenson, Angus. Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
Suryono. Penyelesaian Sengketa Kesehatan, Salemba Medika, Jakarta, 2011.
United Nations Department of Political Affairs (UNDPA). Guidance for Effective Mediation, United Nations, New York, 2012.
United Nations Ombudsman and Mediation Services (UNOMS). Mediation Principle and Guidelines. United Nations Peacemaker, New York, 2010.
Witanto, D. Y. Hukum Acara Mediasi, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2011.
Jurnal, Tesis, dan Disertasi
Adiyaryani, Ni Nengah, Asas Independensi Dan Imparsialitas Hakim Menurut Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2017.
Amirthalingam, Kumaralingam. Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship, Annual National MedicoLegal Seminar Proceeding, Singapore, 2016.
Annas, G. J. Doctors, Patients, and Lawyers - Two Centuries of Health Law. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2012.
Bailey, Paul. Neutrality in Mediation: An Ambiguous Ethical Value, Journal of Mediation and Applied Conflict Analysis, 2014.
Devere, Barclay. The Difference between “Neutral” and “Impartial” in Mediation diunduh dari http://www.barclaydevere.co.uk/difference-neutral-impartial-mediation/ pada 13 Juni 2019 pukul 14.34.
Exon, Susan Nauss. The Effects that Mediator Styles Impose on Neutrality and Impartiality Requirements of Mediation, USFL Rev, 2007.
Gerami, Arghavan. Bridging the Theory and Practice Gap: Mediator Power in Practice, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2019.
Jauhani, M. A. Dilema Kualitas dan Netralitas Dokter sebagai Mediator Kasus Malpraktik, Kongres Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 2018.
Jauhani, M. A. Proportionality as The Application of Impartiality in Indonesian Medical Disputes Mediation. 5th Asian Mediator Conference (pp. 1-6). Jakarta: Pusat Mediasi Nasional, 2018.
Kellet, A. J. Healing Angry Wounds: The Roles of Apology and Mediation in Disputes Between Physicians and Patients. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2017.
Lee, Su Mi. Mediator Impartiality and Mediator Interest, Theses and Dissertations Political Science, 2015.
Nagarajan, R dan Prabhu, R. Competence and Capability – A New Look, International Journal of Management (IJM), Volume 6, Issue 6, Juni 2015
Nasser, M. Sengketa Medis Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan. Annual Scientific Meeting FK UGM (pp. 1-10). Yogyakarta, Lustrum FK UGM, 2011
Nasser, M. Medical Dispute in Indonesia Health. Legal and Forensic Medicine, 2013.
Nederlands, Mediatorsfederatie, MfN-Mediationreglement, 2019
Nemie, Puteri. Mediating Medical Negligence Claims in Malaysia: An Option for Reform?, Asia Pacific Mediaton Forum, 2017.
Papayannis, Diego M. Independence, Impartiality and Neutrality in Legal Adjudication, Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, Volume 28, Juni 2016.
Purwadianto, A., & Meilia, P. I. Tinjauan Etis Rangkap Profesi Dokter - Pengacara. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2017.
Rajoo, Datuk Sundra. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Malaysia, The 2019 Moscow Dispute Resolution Conference Proceeding, 2019.
Sugiharto, Agus Dwi, Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Antara Rumah Sakit Dengan Pasien Melalui Jalur Mediasi (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta), Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2015.
Wilianti, Resa, Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Malpraktik Di Bidang Pelayanan Kesehatan, Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2017.
Yingxiang, K. Mediation The First Port of Call For Medical Disputes. SMA News, 2018.
Laman
https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/. diakses 11 Mei 2019, Jam 14.45 WIB.
https://mfnregister.nl/login-registermediator/condities/ diakses 14 Mei 2019, Jam 01.10 WIB.
https://msb.org.au/ diakses 13 Juni 2019, Jam 03.08 WIB.
https://thelawdictionary.org/search2/?cx=partner-pub-2225482417208543%3A5634069718&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=UTF-8&q=mental+ability&x=0&y=0 diakses 12 Juni 2019, Jam 07.49 WIB.
https://www.barclaydevere.co.uk/difference-neutral-impartial-mediation/. diakses pada 13 Juni 2019, Jam 14.34 WIB.
https://www.cmpsolutions.com/ diakses pada 28 Juni 2019, Jam 01.06 WIB
http://www.malaysianmediationcentre.org/what-is-mediation/mediators-rules-code-of-ethics/ diakses pada 28 Juni 2019, Jam 01.54 WIB.
https://www.oed.com/ diakses pada 26 Juni 2019, Jam 17.14 WIB.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/shk.v6i2.2553
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 SOEPRA: Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan